Legal compliance | All plants operated by Tractebel Energia have environmental approvals and licenses required by the current legislation. The Company monitors changes in the laws, standards and resolutions regulating its activities. Precautionary procedures are adopted to ensure that all the plants in the generator complex have the necessary authorities and environmental licenses required by the appropriate government bodies on a timely basis and with the correct validity. Tractebel Energia assesses and calibrates its operations and procedures whenever necessary to ensure adherence to the legal requirements as well as other voluntary commitments it has assumed. Such adjustments are based on issues raised through the management system as well as eventual divergences identified by audits.
In 2015, the Company renewed the operational licenses for four plants: Pedra do Sal Wind Farm, the Ferrari Thermoelectric Power Plant, José Gelazio da Rocha SHP and the Ponte de Pedra Hydroelectric Power Plant. The Tubarão Wind Farm also received its first operational license while the Pampa Sul Thermoelectric Plant obtained its Installation License.
The Company also adopts as standard procedure environmental management goals for plants certified under NBR ISO 14001. The goals set for 2015 are shown as follows.
General Aspects (applicable to all the plants):
- Relationship with society – visiting program, environmental education, donation of seedlings and the protection of headwaters;
- Reduction in generation of solid waste, liquid effluent and atmospheric emissions – including recovery and recycling activities;
- Participation in relevant committees and associations (for example, hydrographic basin committees); and
- Maintenance of valid environmental licenses.
Specifications for hydroelectric plants:
- Management of riparian zones along reservoir banks;
- Mitigation and compensation of environmental impacts caused by reservoir filling and power plant operations;
- Release of fish stocks.
Specifications for thermoelectric plants:
- Increase in energy efficiency and a reduction in CO2 emissions.
In 2015, the Company set a total of 103 environmental goals with formal programs, performance indicators and measurement. The year-end situation was as follows:
Unit |
Nº of Goals |
In progress |
Achieved |
Not achieved |
Jorge Lacerda Thermoelectric Plant |
12 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
Lages Cogeneration Plant |
5 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
Cana Brava Hydroelectric Plant |
7 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
Estreito Hydroelectric Plant |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
Itá Hydroelectric Plant |
9 |
2 |
7 |
0 |
Machadinho Hydroelectric Plant |
8 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
Passo Fundo Hydroelectric Plant |
8 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
Ponte de Pedra Hydroelectric Plant |
9 |
0 |
6 |
3 |
São Salvador Hydroelectric Plant |
9 |
1 |
6 |
2 |
Salto Osório Hydroelectric Plant |
11 |
3 |
7 |
1 |
Salto Santiago Hydroelectric Plant |
10 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
Charqueadas Thermoelectric Plant |
8 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
William Arjona Thermoelectric Plant |
4 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
TOTAL |
103 |
23 |
57 |
23 |
Biodiversity of water bodies and habitats
GRI G4-EN11 G4-EN12 G4-EN13 G4-EN14 G4-EN26 G4-EU13 G4-DMA (Biodiversity – Environmental) G4-DMA (Biodiversity – Energy Sector)
Hydroelectric plants can have a direct impact on the ichthyofauna (combination of fish species existing in a given bio-geographic region) due to the inflow and outflow of water inherent to energy generation. Tractebel Energia operates its power plants in such a way as to mitigate these impacts. These include various measures to divert fish away from the plant structures or allow them to escape from the interior of the plant to the main water body. In some cases, the fish may actually have to be recovered when for some reason they become trapped inside plant installations. Once captured, the fish are immediately returned to their original habitat.
Tractebel undertakes a range of different preventive measures against the introduction of invasive species, harmful organisms and pathogenic agents which can affect the reliability of energy generation. Among these initiatives are periodic surveys of the population of golden mussel larvae, often to be found in reservoir waters and cooling systems. Among other benefits, these surveys are used to plot the reproduction and life cycles of this organic incrustation, permitting the future adjustment of control methods in accordance with the seasonal reproduction period for this species. A further initiative is the control of aquatic macrophytes to diminish the effects of eutrophication (the excessive presence of nutrients in the water), preventing their indiscriminant development and ensuring the continued multiple use of the reservoirs.
The installation of hydroelectric plants has a transformational effect on the environment with the aquatic environment becoming lentic (reservoirs have a standing water effect) for example. While this process is taking place, changes occur in the physical-chemical characteristics of the water resources. This has a direct impact on the aquatic biodiversity, more especially the ichthoyfauna. Some species find the new environment to be ideal for their survival, development and reproduction, although others are unable to adapt to the new conditions. In order to assess this process over time, Tractebel Energia has been investing in R&D projects and monitoring the ichthyofauna in the regions of the hydroelectric plants it operates. The Company also promotes the periodic release of fish fries (newly hatched fish) into the reservoirs for restocking with native species. In 2015, Tractebel Energia invested approximately R$437.7 thousand in technological projects for developing germplasm banks and the production of native fish species for replenishing the Iguaçu River. In addition, 45 thousand native fish fries were released into the reservoirs along the Iguaçu River - 23 thousand at Salto Santiago HPP and 22 thousand at Salto Osório HPP.
Another impact arising from the installation of a hydroelectric plant is the loss of habitat resulting from flooding during the reservoir filling process. In the course of this process, a good part of the brush is cleared and stranded fauna recovered and relocated to areas in keeping with the original environment. Once the reservoir is filled, a permanent preservation area must be installed with the restoration of areas degraded by construction. While not involved in the installation of any new hydroelectric plant in 2015, Tractebel Energia donated or planted 262,218 seedlings of native forest species in the areas of influence of the plants it operates.
In August 2015, work started on the Pampa Sul TPP in Candiota (RS). Various initiatives were taken towards the conservation of the biodiversity of the Pampa Biome in the region. Among these, of particular importance is the Plant Germplasm Rescue Subprogram, involving the recovery of species on the Critically Endangered Species of Flora List in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. The subprogram is responsible for the relocation of two species of bromeliad, the collection and donation of iguana hackberry and myrtaceae seeds and the transplantation of examples of the swamp corticeira. In addition, the Company also implemented the following programs:
- Fauna Recovery and Relocation Program | For relocating animals found during brush clearance in areas directly impacted by the project.
- Replanting Riparian Green Cover and the Ecological Corridor Connection | Involves initiatives for conservation of riparian and headwater green cover.
- Forestry Replacement Program | For compensating the loss of green cover as a result of plant/reservoir installation.
- Ichthyofauna Rescue and Monitoring Program | Recovery of fish found during the construction process.
- Program for Control and Eradication of Invasive Exotic Plant Species | Helps to control invasive species which compete with and crowd out native species.
The Rational Brush Clearance Plan for the installation of the Santa Mônica Wind Farm Complex begun in 2014, sets out procedures for reducing the impact on the local flora and fauna. While the Company was authorized to clear brush over a 175.1-hectare area, in practice only 28% of this area was effectively cleared. Clearance of 5.79 hectares of a Permanent Preservation Area (APP) for the installation of the project required specific licenses and the replacement of green cover in an area equivalent to twice the size of the area cleared (11.58 hectares), also located in an APP and scheduled for implementation in 2016. In addition, the brush clearance phase at the Complex was run in tandem with the Fauna Rescue and Monitoring Program. Environmental Compensation payment to the licensing body is also required by law with the funds to be allocated to Conservation Units in the state of Ceará – amounts still to be established.
Other key initiatives under the Complex´s Basic Environmental Plan (PBA) in relation to the biodiversity are the Plan for Recovery of Degraded Areas and Control of Erosive Processes; the Water Quality Monitoring Program (surface and groundwater); the Soil Quality Monitoring Program; Noise and Vibration Levels Monitoring Program; and the Environmental Education Program.
THE COMPANY OPERATES A CORPORATE HEADWATERS CONSERVATION PROGRAM WHICH BY DECEMBER 2015, HAD DIRECTLY BENEFITED 903 FAMILIES
In other areas, the Company runs a corporate program for headwater conservation jointly with government organizations and the third sector. The program contributes to the water which the community consumes, helping to reduce pathogen water-borne diseases. Initiatives also include the enclosure of areas in the vicinity of headwater springs, the construction of protective brick-built covering around springs to avoid contamination and the reforestation of the surrounding area with indigenous species. As of December 2015, 831 springs had been protected in this manner to the direct benefit of 903 families. The program was recognized in 2013 with the Brazil Environmental Award. In 2015, this same initiative was ranked third in the Von Martius Sustainability Award, Nature category.
Tractebel Energia maintains operating units located in or adjacent to protected areas and/or areas of high biodiversity value. These are:
Itá HPP
Location: between the municipalities of Itá (SC) and Aratiba (RS).
Reservoir area: 142 km2.
Permanent Preservation Area (APP): 22.56 km2.
Regional biodiversity: 27 species of mammal, 94 of birds, 31 of reptiles, 11 of amphibians, 40 of fish and 60 of flora (tree species).
Conservation Units: Parque Estadual Fritz Plaumann (SC) of 7.41 km2;
Parque Municipal Teixeira Soares (RS) of 4.61 km2; e Parque Municipal de
Preservação Ambiental de Severiano de Almeida (RS) of 0.15 km2.
Cana Brava HPP
Location: municipality of Cavalcante (GO).
Reservoir area: 139 km2.
Permanent Preservation Area (APP): 3.2 km2.
Regional biodiversity: 92 species of mammal, 304 of birds, 98 of fish, 41 of amphibians and 77 of reptiles.
Conservation Units: Avá-Canoeiro indigenous reserve.
Passo Fundo HPP
Location: municipality of Entre Rios do Sul (RS).
Reservoir area: 151 km2.
Permanent Preservation Area (APP): 4.11 km2.
Regional biodiversity: 18 species of mammal, 122 of birds,
14 of reptiles, 10 of amphibians, 44 of fish and 20 of flora.
Conservation Units: Parque Estadual Rondinha, with 10 km2; and Reserva Municipal da Sagrisa, with 4 km2.
Machadinho HPP
Location: between the municipalities of Piratuba (SC) and Maximiliano de Almeida (RS).
Reservoir area: 79 km2.
Permanent Preservation Area (APP): 44.05 km2.
Regional biodiversity: 52 species of mammal, 192 of birds, 63 of fish, at least two species of reptile and 522 of flora.
Conservation Units: Parque Florestal Estadual Espigão Alto (RS), with 13.33 km2.
Salto Santiago HPP
Location: between the municipalities of Rio Bonito do Iguaçu and Saudade do Iguaçu (PR).
Reservoir area: 208 km2.
Permanent Preservation Area (APP): the mandatory acquisition of areas for the formation of an APP was not required by the legislation at the time the plant was installed.
Regional biodiversity: 14 species of mammal, 302 species of birds, 14 species of amphibians and 39 species of fish.
Ponte de Pedra HPP
Location: between the municipalities of Itiquira (MT) and Sonora (MS).
Reservoir area: 14.5 km2.
Permanent Preservation Area (APP): 7.8 km2.
Regional biodiversity: 80 species of mammal, 249 of birds, 58 of reptiles, 17 of amphibians and nine invertebrates.
Conservation Units: the plant reservoir is adjacent to the Parque Estadual da Serra de Sonora with approximately 79 km2.
José Gelazio da Rocha SHP
Location: Rondonópolis (MT).
Reservoir area: 0.27 km2.
Permanent Preservation Area (APP): the legislation does not require the installation of an APP along the margins of the plant reservoir.
Regional biodiversity: 80 species of mammal, 249 of birds, 58 of reptiles, 17 of amphibians and nine invertebrates.
Conservation Units: Parque Estadual Dom Osório Stoffel, with 64.22 km2.
Salto Osório HPP
Location: between the municipalities of São Jorge d’Oeste and Quedas do Iguaçu (PR).
Reservoir area: 55 km2.
Permanent Preservation Area (APP): the mandatory acquisition of areas for the formation of an APP was not required by the legislation at the time the plant was installed.
Regional biodiversity: 13 mammals, 303 bird species, 09 species of amphibians and 39 species of fish.
Rondonópolis SHP
Location: Rondonópolis (MT).
Reservoir area: 0.024 km2.
Permanent Preservation Area (APP): not required by the legislation along the plant reservoir margins.
Regional biodiversity: 80 species of mammal, 249 of birds, 58 of reptiles, 17 amphibians and nine invertebrates.
Conservation Units: Parque Estadual Dom Osório Stoffel, with 64.22 km2.
São Salvador HPP
Location: between the municipalities of São Salvador do Tocantins and Paranã (TO).
Reservoir area: 104 km2.
Permanent Preservation Area (APP): 47.53 km2.
Regional biodiversity: 26 species of mammal, 242 of birds, 38 of reptiles, 29 of amphibians and 209 of fish.
Conservation Units: Environmental Protection Area of Lago de São Salvador do Tocantins, Paranã and Palmeirópolis, with 145.25 km2.
Estreito HPP
Location: between the municipalities of Estreito (MA), Aguiarnópolis and Palmeiras do Tocantins (TO).
Reservoir area: 555.0 km².
Permanent Preservation Area (APP): 125.0 km².
Regional biodiversity: two species of aquatic mammal, 164 of birds, 21 of reptiles, 38 of amphibians and 50 of fish.
Conservation Units: The reservoir runs adjacent to the Monumento Natural das Árvores Fossilizadas Conservation Unit, with 356.3 km².
Areia Branca SHP
Location: Caratinga and Ipanema (MG).
Reservoir area: 1.36 km2.
Permanent Preservation Area (APP): 112.71 hectares around the plant reservoir.
Regional biodiversity: 17 species of mammal, 191 of birds, six species of reptile and 20 species of amphibian.
Conservation Units: none in the directly affected area.
The Company also conducts surveys of species in the areas contiguous to the reservoirs. However, there is still no consolidated number of how many species figure on the national conservation lists. In 2014, the Company began a survey in two regions of the species included on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s (IUCN) Red List of Endangered Species with the following results: GRI G4-EN14
Areas covered by the Salto Santiago and Salto Osório HPPs
- Vulnerable: six species, of which two are avifauna and four, flora.
- Near threatened: 15 species of which 12 are avifauna, two mammalian fauna and one, flora.
- Endangered: three species of which two are flora and one, avifauna.
- Critically endangered: one species of flora.
- Least concern: 246 species, of which three are ichthyofauna, 41 mammalian fauna, 184, avifauna, 17 herpetofauna and one of flora.
Area covered by the Ponte de Pedra HPP and José Gelazio and Rondonópolis SHPs
- Vulnerable: four species.
- Near threatened: two species.
- Endangered: zero.
- Critically endangered: zero.
- Least concern: 103 species.
Given the nature of its business and current Brazilian legislation, the Company does not substitute habitats. Rather, it practices a process of environmental compensation through the allocation of a percentage of its investments destined for the installation of the power plant projects. Hence, Tractebel Energia supports the implementation and maintenance of conservation units in the regions in which it operates such as the Parque Estadual Fritz Plaumann and the Parque Natural Municipal Mata do Rio Uruguai Teixeira Soares. The Parque Estadual Fritz Plaumann covers an area of 717.5 hectares and is one of the most important environmental protection areas in the state of Santa Catarina as well as being a benchmark for management and organization. The Company was one of the parties responsible for its installation in 2006, representing environmental compensation for the licensing of the Itá Hydroelectric Power Plant. The Company’s joint operations with government and the third sector have been crucial for protecting the park, which includes one of the few remaining stands of Uruguay River Forest (or Deciduous Seasonal Forest), part of the Atlantic Rain Forest biome and classified as critically endangered. The conservation unit is administered by the state of Santa Catarina Protection Agency (Fatma), with technical collaboration from the State Park’s Co-management Team (Ecopef) and an Advisory Board representing 19 institutions.
The Parque Natural Municipal Mata do Rio Uruguai Teixeira Soares in the municipality of Marcelino Ramos in the state of Rio Grande do Sul is a Conservation Unit of 423 hectares. The conservation unit was donated to the community by the Itá Consortium of which Tractebel Energia is a part. The park was developed as environmental compensation (also for the licensing of the Itá Hydroelectric Power Plant) by the Brazilian Institute for the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources – IBAMA. The reason for selection and acquisition of the location for the park in the 1990s was similarly due to the existence of some of the remaining stands of Deciduous Seasonal Forest. The area represents a genetic bank, serving to replenish and maintain the region’s flora and fauna, including several species on the critically endangered list. Another notable characteristic of the park is management conducted on a participative basis with the support of an Advisory Council, its members drawn from 16 local institutions.
In 2015, no impacts on the biodiversity due to the introduction of substances that do not occur naturally in the habitats were identified. Furthermore, no monitoring and measurement of changes in habitat, ecological processes and direct and indirect impacts on affected species were conducted. Similarly, no measurement was made of the extent of impacted areas and reversibility or irreversibility of the impacts.
TRACTEBEL ENERGIA SUPPORTS THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF CONSERVATION UNITS IN THE REGIONS OF INFLUENCE SURROUNDING ITS UNITS
Water
GRI G4-DMA (Water) G4-DMA (Effluent and waste)
Water withdrawal by the Company is regulated and inspected by the official agencies responsible for each region. In situations representing risks to water sources, withdrawal is suspended. Monitoring of quality indicators of water discharged into water bodies is conducted periodically using physical-chemical and biochemical analyzes in order to prevent pollution and/or contamination of the water source. The discharge of water used in the cooling systems of thermoelectric power plants complies with the standards required by the current legislation. In 2015, Tractebel Energia discharged a total of 842,031,622.98 m3 of water on a planned basis at a quality compatible with current legislation. GRI G4-EN22
Total water withdrawal by source
GRI G4-EN8
Water sources |
Volume 2014 |
Volume 2015 |
Surface water* |
845,048,505.0 m3 |
845,236,521.25 m3 |
Ground water |
29,696.0 m3 |
21,150.94 m3 |
Rainwater collected directly and stored by the organization |
1,622,400.0 m3 |
2,155,440.00 m3 |
Municipal water supplies or other water utilities |
6,434.0 m3 |
1,879,059.24 m3 |
Total volume of water withdrawn |
846,707,035.00 m3 |
849,292,171.43 m3 |
The criteria used in the calculations and measurement of water withdrawal comply with the requirements of ENGIE, Tractebel Energia’s controlling company. Data is audited annually by a third party.
*No water is withdrawn from wetlands, lakes and the sea. |
The Charqueadas, Ferrari, Ibitiuva, Wiliam Arjona, Lages and the Jorge Lacerda Thermoelectric Plants operate on a closed circuit basis, recycling the water used in the generation process. The following table shows the percentage portion and volume of water recycled and reused in relation to total consumption.
Percentage and total volume of recycled and reused water
GRI G4-EN10
|
2014 |
2015 |
Total and percentage of recycled water |
22,465,181.0 m3 (2.7%) |
20,558,439.92 m3 (2.42%) |
Total and percentage of reused water |
2,155,440.00 m3 (0,25%) |
7,697,502.25 m3 (0.91%) |
Total and percentage of withdrawal of rain water |
1,622,400.0 m3 (0.2%) |
2,155,440.00 m3 (0,25%) |
The criteria used in the calculations and measurement of water withdrawal comply with the requirements of ENGIE, Tractebel Energia’s controlling company. Data is audited annually by a third party. |
Fuels
GRI G4-DMA (Energy)
Tractebel Energia’s Policy on Climate Change incorporates measures for reducing the consumption of fossil fuels, among these the preferential use of flex-fueled vehicles, the engagement of collective passenger transportation services at the majority of plants and the use of conference calls and video conferencing. The following tables show the consumption of fossil fuels and energy intensity for 2015 and 2014.
Energy consumption within the organization
GRI G4-EN3 G4-EU2
|
|
|
2014 |
2015 |
Sale |
By type* |
Electric energy sold |
37,072 GWh
(4,232 average MW) |
36,012 GWh
(4,111 average MW) |
Steam sold |
25.4 GWh |
24 GWh |
Consumption |
Non-renewable |
Coal |
58,987,165.12 GJ |
58,370,842.88 GJ |
Diesel Oil |
158,458.38 GJ |
112,604.13 GJ |
Fuel Oil |
111,729.13 GJ |
198,905.66 GJ |
Gas |
15,301,731.72 GJ |
13,643,509.79 GJ |
Total |
74,559,084.35 GJ |
72,325,862.46 GJ |
Renewable |
Wood-based biomass |
2,374,328.34 GJ |
2,441,765.81 GJ |
Sugarcane-based biomass |
7,736,777.24 GJ |
8,635,209.87 GJ |
Total |
10,111,105.58 GJ |
11,076,975.68 GJ |
By type |
Consumption of grid electricity² |
616,546.1 GJ |
660,145.50 GJ¹ |
Total |
Total consumption of energy³ |
85,286,736.03 GJ |
84,062,983.64 GJ |
Standards, methodologies and assumptions adopted: the criteria used in the calculations and measurement of water withdrawal comply with the requirements of ENGIE, Tractebel Energia’s controlling company. Data is audited annually by a third party.
*The amount shown as energy sold corresponds to proprietary energy from the business and not the excess from self-production.
1. The amount relates to energy consumption at the units (industrial use + administrative buildings).
2. References (electric energy): the Invoicing Metering System (SMF) is responsible for recording data for electric energy generated and consumed by the plants. There are various norms for minimizing equipment faults and avoiding possible fraud. The technical aspects to which the SMF should be submitted, are subject to ONS guidance. On the other hand, the way the data is handled and the terms and rules for delivering the information are established by the Electric Energy Trade Board (CCEE).
3. Total energy consumption = total renewable fuels + total non-renewable fuels + Grid consumption. |
Energy intensity |
2014 |
2015 |
Consumption of energy within the Company (GJ) |
84,062,983.64 |
85,286,736.03 |
Energy production (GJ) |
171,440,768.65 |
176,191,271.92 |
Energy intensity (Consumption of energy within the Organization/Production of energy)* |
0.49 |
0.48 |
*Types of energy included in the intensity ratio: fossil fuels, renewable fuels and energy from the Grid. |
The Jorge Lacerda Thermoelectric Complex accounts for 76.6% of installed capacity in Tractebel Energia’s entire thermoelectric generation complex. The JLTC recorded a slight year-on-year increase of approximately 0.5% in energy consumption during 2015. The result reflects largely shortfalls in output at UTLA, the most efficient plant in the Complex. The main causes were: the formation of ash deposits, a fault in the feed water heater and increased consumption as well as reduction in efficiency of UTLA2 due to natural wear and tear of the equipment (overhaul scheduled for 2016/2017). However, there was no significant decline in consumption at UTLA1 and UTLB, principally due to initial installation work on investments, overhauls and corrective maintenance work in 2015 and improvements in operational and maintenance procedure.
In 2016, the Company envisages greater reductions as a result of the implementation of investments at UTLA1 (new precipitator, replacement of turbine vanes, new condenser and economizer) and the start of other actions and adaptations at UTLA2: combustion system, BP turbine and automation modernization. In relation to auxiliary energy consumption, there was a 0.5% reduction in relation to 2014.
Reduction of energy consumption
GRI G4-EN6
Year |
Coal consumption (t) |
Net generation (MWh) |
LHV* (kcal/kg) |
LHV (kJ/kg) |
Specific coal consumption (kJ/kWh) |
Reduction (%) |
2015 |
3,252,723 |
4,458,498 |
3,865 |
1,6157 |
11,787 |
0.44 |
2014 |
3,292,797 |
4,506,770 |
3,851 |
1,6096 |
11,735 |
0.32 |
2013 |
3,671,283 |
5,156,550 |
3,956 |
1,6536 |
11,773 |
3.86 |
*Lower heating value (LHV).
Standards, methodologies and assumptions adopted: (i) NBR ISO 50.001, which describes the energy use and consumption and energy efficiency, and (ii) ASTM PTC 4-2008, for calculation of efficiency and lower heating value for coal. Types of energy included in the reductions and base used for the calculation: fossil fuel (mineral coal). |
THE COMPANY ENVISAGES ADOPTION OF MEASURES TO REDUCE FOSSIL FUEL CONSUMPTION, AMONG THEM, THE PREFERENTIAL USE OF FLEX-FUEL CARS
Waste
GRI G4-EN23 G4-EN25 G4-DMA (Effluent and waste)
Tractebel seeks to dispose of waste generated from its units in an environmentally correct manner and, wherever possible, to promote its reuse or recycling. The Company neither imports nor exports waste, insists that the companies engaged for final disposal comply with the appropriate environmental legislation, particularly Law 12,305/2010, which introduced the National Solid Waste Policy.
Disposal method |
Hazardous Waste (ton) |
Non-hazardous waste (ton) |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
Reuse |
66.58 |
8.71 |
2.12 |
7.6 |
Recycling |
42.33 |
112.7 |
1,806,806.09 |
1,809,045.00 |
Composting |
NA |
NA |
69.05 |
40.91 |
Recovery of degraded areas |
NA |
NA |
563.01 |
1,756.67 |
Recovery, including energy recovery |
0.0063 |
NA |
116.83
(used as fuel) |
111.68 |
Incineration (mass burn) |
17.04 |
0.02 |
NA |
N/A |
Landfill |
226.42 |
324.74 |
1,592.05 |
356.89 |
Coal mine shafts |
NA |
N/A |
61,187.49 |
39,328.77 |
Onsite storage |
93.38 |
68.33 |
25.94 |
38.35 |
Co-processing |
223.64 |
150.9 |
24.40 |
1.25 |
Road surfacing |
NA |
NA |
0.51 |
0.74 |
The increase in the amount of incinerated hazardous waste compared with 2014 is due to the final disposal of remaining pallets following the installation of the Trairi Wind Complex.
The generation of driftwood in hydroelectric plant reservoirs varies from one period to another, so justifying a significant decrease in 2015 relative to the preceding year. This variation can be seen in the amounts of non-hazardous waste used for the recovery of degraded areas.
The increase in the amount of ash disposed in coal pits is justified by the crisis in the civil construction industry with the consequent reduction in demand for this type of waste for cement manufacture.
The substitution of electrostatic precipitators at UTLA resulted in an increase in the number of outsourced workers at the installations of CTJL. This contributed to a notable increase in the generation of sewage sludge and consequently the amount of non-hazardous waste disposed in Class II landfills. |
THE WASTE FROM TRACTEBEL ENERGIAS’S UNITS IS DISPOSED CORRECTLY IN LINE WITH THE CURRENT LEGISLATION SUCH AS THE NATIONAL SOLID WASTE POLICY
Total weight of waste generated and destination, by method of disposal
GRI G4-EN23
HAZARDOUS WASTE |
|
|
|
|
Description |
Generated (tons) |
Disposed (tons) |
Disposed (%) |
Final Destination |
Water contaminated oil |
14.80 |
14.26 |
96.4 |
Class I industrial landfill |
Industrial batteries |
0.14 |
0.13 |
96.6 |
Oil and schist sludge |
0.02 |
0.02 |
100.0 |
Paint sludge |
0.20 |
0.13 |
67.4 |
Oil contaminated gravel |
0.06 |
0.06 |
100.0 |
Print cartridges and toners |
0.02 |
0.02 |
91.1 |
Contaminated packaging (contaminated solids) |
22.42 |
20.58 |
91.8 |
Sand blasting slag |
86.26 |
86.01 |
99.7 |
Spent lamps in general |
1.04 |
0.84 |
80.8 |
Sanitary sewage sludge |
70.29 |
70.29 |
100.0 |
Acoustic insulation foam paneling |
0.07 |
0.07 |
100.0 |
Materials containing mercury |
0.00 |
0.00 |
100.0 |
Materials contaminated with oils, grease and chemical products |
31.42 |
26.62 |
84.7 |
Materials containing asbestos or glass wool |
3.30 |
3.26 |
98.8 |
Wet and dry cell batteries |
0.25 |
0.17 |
66.0 |
Chemical products |
0.84 |
0.62 |
73.9 |
Kerosene and other contaminated solvents (washing of parts) |
1.04 |
0.96 |
92.3 |
Health services waste |
0.01 |
0.01 |
100.0 |
Solder dross (electrodes, wires, welding rods, tin) |
1.04 |
1.01 |
96.8 |
Resins in general |
2.43 |
1.19 |
49.0 |
Electrical-electronic scrap |
1.32 |
0.18 |
13.8 |
Solder dross (electrodes, wires, welding rods, tin) |
9.36 |
8.42 |
90.0 |
Solder dross (electrodes, wires, welding rods, tin) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
100.0 |
Sanitary Landfill |
Electrical-electronic scrap |
0.00 |
0.00 |
100.0 |
Chemical products |
17.00 |
17.00 |
100.0 |
Incineration |
Health services waste |
0.04 |
0.04 |
100.0 |
Water contaminated oil |
153.23 |
153.23 |
100.0 |
REC.
Co-Processing |
Oil or schist sludge |
5.09 |
5.09 |
100.0 |
Oil contaminated gravel |
12.72 |
12.38 |
97.4 |
Print cartridges and toners |
0.13 |
0.12 |
93.7 |
Contaminated packaging (contaminated solids) |
1.54 |
1.45 |
94.1 |
Aerosol packaging |
0.00 |
0.00 |
100.0 |
Residual grease |
0.12 |
0.12 |
100.0 |
Spent lamps |
0.11 |
0.11 |
100.0 |
Materials contaminated with oils, grease and chemical products |
58.76 |
47.30 |
80.5 |
Materials containing asbestos or glass wool |
0.01 |
0.01 |
100.0 |
Chemical products |
0.18 |
0.18 |
100.0 |
Kerosene and other contaminated solvents (washing of parts) |
0.03 |
0.03 |
100.0 |
Solder dross (electrodes, wires, welding rods, tin) |
0.07 |
0.07 |
100.0 |
Resins in general |
3.52 |
3.52 |
100.0 |
Electrical-electronic scrap |
0.06 |
0.04 |
70.4 |
Industrial batteries |
3.44 |
3.44 |
100.0 |
REC.
Recycling |
Print cartridges and toners |
0.14 |
0.06 |
42.2 |
Aerosol packaging |
0.38 |
0.27 |
72.0 |
Agrochemical packaging |
0.03 |
0.00 |
11.6 |
Spent lamps in general |
3,30 |
2,58 |
78,1 |
Used insulation oils |
3.29 |
3.29 |
100.0 |
Used lubrication oils |
23.10 |
23.10 |
100.0 |
Dry and wet cell batteries |
1.73 |
0.19 |
11.1 |
Electrical-electronic scrap |
9.74 |
9.40 |
96.6 |
Print cartridges and toners |
0.45 |
0.39 |
87.0 |
REC.
Reutilization |
Used insulation oil |
0.40 |
0.40 |
100.0 |
Used lubrication oil |
65.96 |
61.44 |
93.1 |
Returnable industrial towels |
4.36 |
4.36 |
100.0 |
Sanitary sewage sludge |
0.01 |
0.01 |
100.0 |
REC.
Utilization as Fuel |
NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE |
|
|
|
|
Description |
Generated (tons) |
Disposed (tons) |
Disposed (%) |
Final Destination |
Styrofoam |
0.02 |
0.02 |
100.0 |
Controlled Landfill |
Sanitary sewage sludge |
78.54 |
78.54 |
100.0 |
Wood |
0.08 |
0.03 |
40.6 |
Plastics |
0.04 |
0.04 |
100.0 |
Common waste (food, lavatory paper, cigarette packaging) |
3.71 |
3.71 |
100.0 |
Organic waste |
10.56 |
10.56 |
100.0 |
Construction rubble |
101.55 |
101.55 |
100.0 |
Class II industrial landfill |
Sand blasting slag |
55.46 |
48.77 |
87.9 |
Filters from air conditioning systems |
0.03 |
0.01 |
31.3 |
Styrofoam |
0.08 |
0.08 |
96.4 |
Stone wool |
205.46 |
205.35 |
99.9 |
Sanitary sewage sludge |
921.50 |
921.50 |
100.0 |
Sludge from water treatment plants |
12.36 |
12.36 |
100.0 |
Wood |
0.92 |
0.92 |
100.0 |
Sleeves (sleeve filters) |
9.20 |
9.20 |
100.0 |
Acoustic insulation foam paneling |
0.09 |
0.09 |
100.0 |
Common waste (food, lavatory paper, cigarette packaging) |
5.23 |
4.92 |
94.1 |
Organic waste |
15.80 |
15.40 |
97.4 |
Non-contaminated industrial solids (non-contaminated silica gel, air conditioning filters, files, PVS waste, hosepipes) |
19.37 |
15.83 |
81.7 |
Rubber scrap |
2.74 |
2.55 |
93.1 |
Glass |
0.67 |
0.61 |
91.2 |
Air conditioning filters |
0.02 |
0.02 |
100.0 |
Sanitary Landfill |
Styrofoam |
0.23 |
0.23 |
100.0 |
Cooking oil |
0.12 |
0.12 |
100.0 |
Cardboard and paper |
5.37 |
5.37 |
100.0 |
Plastics |
0.16 |
0.16 |
100.0 |
Common waste (food, lavatory paper, cigarette packaging) |
126.89 |
126.89 |
100.0 |
Organic waste |
26.23 |
26.23 |
100.0 |
Non-contaminated industrial solids (non-contaminated silica gel, air conditioning filters, files, PVS waste, hosepipes) |
0.02 |
0.02 |
100.0 |
Rubber scrap |
0.85 |
0.79 |
92.3 |
Ferrous metal scrap |
0.04 |
0.04 |
100.0 |
Non-ferrous metal scrap (copper, aluminum, brass, stainless steel, silver, bronze) |
0.06 |
0.06 |
100.0 |
Glass |
0.08 |
0.08 |
100.0 |
Wood |
0.20 |
0.20 |
100.0 |
Incineration |
Wood |
2.60 |
2.60 |
100.0 |
REC,
Composting |
Organic waste |
66.45 |
66.45 |
100.0 |
Air conditioning filters |
0.12 |
0.12 |
100.0 |
REC,
Co-processing |
Styrofoam |
0.00 |
0.00 |
100.0 |
Stone wool |
21.12 |
21.12 |
100.0 |
Rubber scrap |
2.22 |
1.90 |
85.5 |
Electrical-electronic scrap |
1.55 |
1.28 |
82.7 |
Construction site rubble |
0.51 |
0.51 |
100.0 |
REC,
Paving of highways |
Fly ash |
1,072,847.62 |
1,072,847.62 |
100.0 |
REC,
Recycling |
Bottom ash (boilers) |
595,093.55 |
595,093.55 |
100.0 |
Plaster |
19,913.60 |
19,913.60 |
100.0 |
Styrofoam |
0.02 |
0.02 |
100.0 |
Wood |
0.18 |
0.18 |
100.0 |
Cooking oil |
0.40 |
0.40 |
100.0 |
Cardboard and paper |
43.57 |
43.13 |
99.0 |
Plastics |
24.95 |
23.79 |
95.3 |
Rubber scrap |
0.36 |
0.18 |
49.3 |
Ferrous metal scrap |
2,049.53 |
2,047.26 |
99.9 |
Non-ferrous metal scrap (copper, aluminum, brass, stainless steel, silver, bronze) |
144.98 |
144.61 |
99.7 |
Glass |
0.06 |
0.06 |
100.0 |
Driftwood (wood waste accumulating in reservoirs) |
563.01 |
563.01 |
100.0 |
REC,
Recovery of degraded areas |
Wood |
0.42 |
0.40 |
95.6 |
REC,
Reutilization |
Organic waste |
0.13 |
0.13 |
100.0 |
Ferrous metal waste |
1.81 |
1.56 |
86.4 |
Non-ferrous metal scrap (copper, aluminum, brass, stainless steel, silver, bronze) |
0.03 |
0.02 |
88.4 |
Wood |
116.83 |
116.83 |
100.0 |
REC,
Reutilization as fuel |
Bottom ash (boilers) |
60,205.65 |
60,205.65 |
100.0 |
Coalmines |
Plaster |
981.84 |
981.84 |
100.0 |
Bottom ash (boilers) |
30,735.81 |
30,735.81 |
100.0 |
REC,
Recycling |
Fly ash |
15,845.03 |
15,845.03 |
100.0 |
The Company sells fly ash from its coal-fired thermoelectric plants to the cement industry as part of its commitment to the corporate Policy on Climate Change. The use of fly ash contributes to the reduction in CO2 emissions by substituting limestone in cement manufacture. Ash from the biomass plants is used in agriculture to replace conventional agricultural inputs, among these limestone.
On the other hand, bottom ash is used as foundation material for highway asphalting. This same material is also used to neutralize soil acidity in the recovery of coalmine tailings due to their high pH. Some of the bottom ash from the Charqueadas Thermoelectric Plant is returned to coal mining areas and used for the environmental recovery of land directly contiguous to the mine affected by coal mining activities.
Disposal – ash to the cement industry
|
2014 (t) |
2015 (t) |
Change (%) |
Charqueadas Thermoelectric Power Plant |
120,977.14 |
198,940.01 |
39.2 |
Jorge Lacerda Thermoelectric Power Plant |
1,647,458.53 |
1,469,001.16 |
-10.8 |
Disposal – ash for agriculture/forestry work
|
2014 (t) |
2015 (t) |
Change (%) |
Lages Co-generation Plant |
33,931.81 |
17,265.38 |
-49.1 |
Ibitiuva Thermoelectric Power Plant |
11,516.00 |
29,315.46 |
60.7 |
Ferrari Thermoelectric Power Plant |
61,472.00 |
70,110.85 |
12.3 |
Emissions
GRI G4-DMA (Emissions)
Greenhouse Gas emissions (in tCO2e)
Emission sources |
Operational Control |
Corporate Participation |
Operational Control |
Corporate Participation |
Operational Control |
Corporate Participation |
|
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
Scope 1 GRI G4-EN15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stationary combustion |
6,449,189.72 |
6,447,636.82 |
6,358,562.58 |
6,357,397.51 |
6,093,182.65 |
6,091,658.38 |
Mobile combustion |
557.73 |
564.60 |
671.54 |
693.97 |
637.11 |
658.51 |
Processes |
2,346.56 |
2,349.56 |
4,120.11 |
4,120.11 |
5,345.05 |
5,345.05 |
Fugitive emissions |
172.17 |
172.35 |
26.14 |
1,170.04 |
226.73 |
236.13 |
Agricultural activities |
20.34 |
20.91 |
4.63 |
11.21 |
5.73 |
8.30 |
Solid waste |
0.68 |
0.68 |
0.37 |
0.37 |
12.61 |
2.89 |
Total scope 1 |
6,452,290.19 |
6,450,744.91 |
6,363,385.37 |
6,363,393.22 |
6,099,409.88 |
6,097,919.26 |
Scope 2 GRI G4-EN16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of electricity from the grid |
18,847.60 |
20,168.44 |
18,711.25 |
19,670.31 |
18,751.32 |
19,709.00 |
Scope 3 GRI G4-EN17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activities related to fuel and energy not included in scopes 1 and 2 |
5.87 |
5.87 |
1,642.86 |
1,642.86 |
39.97 |
39.97 |
Transportation and distribution (upstream) |
16,180.97 |
16,361.54 |
18,679.86 |
18,800.61 |
19,824.84 |
19,929.93 |
Waste generated in the operations |
57.67 |
63.66 |
502.26 |
503.31 |
807.45 |
816.05 |
Business travel |
1,019.16 |
1,126.81 |
662.6 |
718.35 |
915.34 |
981.16 |
Employee commuting (home-work-home) |
362.89 |
393.41 |
345.1 |
484.87 |
458.34 |
498.53 |
Transportation and distribution (downstream) |
10,369.92 |
10,369.92 |
10,020.20 |
10,020.20 |
10,414.26 |
10,414.26 |
Total scope 3 |
27,996.48 |
28,321.21 |
31,852.87 |
32,170.20 |
32,460.21 |
32,679.90 |
Total emissions |
6,499,134.27 |
6,499,234.56 |
6,413,949.50 |
6,415,233.72 |
6,150,621.41 |
6,150,308.17 |
Biomass emissions (tCO2) |
502,360.53 |
426,155.73 |
941,304.07 |
882,667.28 |
1,102,109.56 |
1,025,261.65 |
Non-Kyoto gases (tCO2e) |
0.35 |
0.36 |
279.39 |
325.59 |
374.67 |
438.35 |
Based on the emissions from the plants for which it has operational control, Tractebel Energia reported a total year-on-year decline in 2015 of 4.11% from 6,413,949.50 tCO2e in 2014 to 6,150,621.41 tCO2e in 2015. There was a reduction in Scopes 1 and 2 and an increase in emissions under Scope 3.
Tractebel Energia´s GGE by scope in tCO
2e – Operational Control basis (2013-2015)
GRI G4-EN19
Scopes |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
Scope 1 |
6,452,290.19 |
6,363,385.37 |
6,099,409.88 |
Scope 2 |
18,847.6 |
18,711.25 |
18,751.32 |
Scope 3 |
27,966.44 |
31,852.87 |
32,460.21 |
Total |
6,499,134.27 |
6,413,949.50 |
6,150,621.41 |
The evolution in GGEs taking the corporate stake approach is intrinsically related to the operational control approach, emissions varying proportionally to Tractebel Energia’s shareholding stake in the plants. Hence, it can be argued that there has been a reduction in total GGEs.
In addition, the Tubarão Wind Farm is shown as part of Tractebel Energia’s generator complex given its 100% operational control and 100% stake in the project although plant emissions are insufficient to have any impact on Tractebel Energia’s aggregate emissions (growth of 11.20 tCO2e in 2015 emissions).
Tractebel Energia’s GGEs in tCO
2e – Corporate Stake basis (2013-2015)
GRI G4-EN19
Scopes |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
Scope 1 |
6,450,744.91 |
6,363,393.22 |
6,097,919.26 |
Scope 2 |
20,168.44 |
19,670.31 |
19,709.00 |
Scope 3 |
28,321.21 |
32,170.20 |
32,679.90 |
Total |
6,499,234.56 |
6,415,233.72 |
6,150,308.17 |
Evolution in emissions from Tractebel Energia´s energy generation in tCO
2e/MWh (2013-2015)
GRI G4-EN18
Basis |
Unit of Measurement |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
Operational Control |
tCO2 |
6,499,134.27 |
6,413,949.50 |
6,150,621.41 |
tCO2/MWh |
0.2356 |
0.2308 |
0.2115 |
Corporate Stake |
tCO2 |
6,499,234.56 |
6,415,233.72 |
6,150,308.17 |
tCO2/MWh |
0.1821 |
0.1715 |
0.1592 |
In the light of the data shown above, there was a decrease in Tractebel Energia’s emissions in 2015 compared with 2014 of 4.13%, in line with a similar decrease taking the operational control approach, of 4.11%.
Volume of emissions of NOx, SOx and other air emissions 2015
GRI G4-EN21
Categories |
Volume of emissions (t) |
NOx |
15,767.94 |
SOx |
119,844.06 |
Particulate matter (MP) |
3,600.06 |
NOx, SOx emissions and other air emissions in t/MWh
GRI G4-EN21
Categories |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
Change 2014 x 2015 (%) |
NOx |
0.00038 |
0.00036 |
0.0003311 |
-8.73 |
SOx |
0.00278 |
0.00242 |
0.0025165 |
3.83 |
MP |
0.00006 |
0.00008 |
0.0000756 |
-5.82 |
From the point of view of plants operated by the Company, emissions of substances which deplete the ozone layer amounted to approximately 0.21t of hydrochlorofluorcarbons – HCFC (R-22), corresponding to 374.67 tCO2e. On the other hand, taking the corporate stake approach, emissions amounted to 0.24 t of R-22, corresponding to 438,35 tCO2e. This gas is used in refrigeration equipment and air conditioning installed at the Company’s units. GRI G4-EN20
The Standards and Methodologies used for measurement were:
- ISO 14064-1:2007 - Greenhouse Gas Effect - Specification and guidance to organizations for quantifying and preparing reports on emissions and removal of greenhouse gases
- Brazilian GGE Program Protocol.
Tractebel Energia’s full Emissions Inventory for 2015 (and all its Subsidiaries) can be found in Attachment I of this Report.
Investments
GRI G4-EN31 G4-DMA (General)
The principal environmentally-dedicated investments made in 2015 were distributed as shown in the following table.
Total Environmental Protection Expenditures and Investments by Type
GRI G4-EN31
Category of investments |
Investments (CAPEX) |
Amount (R$) |
Prevention and environmental management costs |
Implementation of a herbarium at Passo Fundo HPP |
165,356.06 |
Installation of Telemetry and Hydrology Stations at the Passo Fundo, Itá, Salto Santiago, São Salvador, Cana Brava and Ponte de Pedra HPPs |
972,535.64 |
Installation of a Conservation Unit (Parque Natural da Mata do Rio Uruguai Teixeira Soares) |
1,213,694.18 |
Installation of an Environmental Monitoring Center and expansion of the Utilities Center Laboratory at CTJL |
569,535.75 |
Equipment for monitoring air quality and meteorological data |
792,842.99 |
Waste disposal, emissions treatment and remediation costs |
Expansion of the Waste Center and the Materials Deposit at Machadinho HPP |
19,284.50 |
Substitution of UTLA’s electrostatic precipitators in the CTJL |
30,686,034.37 |
Waterproofing of the secondary yard for coal storage at CTJL |
637,977.69 |
Total |
|
35,057,261.18 |
Operational Costs (OPEX): R$ 33,570,469.81
Costs of General Civil Liability insurance cover: R$ 640,497.85 |